(Natural News) The Biden administration quietly proposed early this year a series of amendments seeking to strengthen the World Health Organization’s (WHO) ability to unilaterally intervene in the affairs of nations merely suspected of having a “health emergency” of possible concern to other nations.
These amendments effectively remove all restraints from WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, who has been put in power for his second five-year term. The amendments were submitted to the WHO on January 18 without an official statement or press conference.
Dr. Peter Breggin, a psychiatrist who had been vocal about the fraud and widespread lies behind the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, explained that these amendments put a line through the restraint on when the WHO can call for a disaster, an emergency or a health disaster or emergency in a country, and can do so without the cooperation, agreement or resistance from the said country.
The 75th World Health Assembly will convene on May 22-28 at the United Nations (UN) headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland to vote on the Biden administration’s amendments that will hand over national sovereignty and authority to the WHO.
The U.S. amendments deleted critical existing restrictions in the regulation: “WHO shall consult with and attempt to obtain verification from the State Party in whose territory the event is allegedly occurring.” The WHO can also draw conclusions based on their considerations, not proof of evidence. There does not have to be an actual threat – it can be a potential threat or public health threat or emergency coming out of the nation.
The proposed amendments don’t have anything to do with evidence. There are no criteria for what constitutes a public health emergency other than what the WHO says. (Related: “TrustWHO” documentary exposes widespread corruption at World Health Organization, driven by Bill Gates.)
Any nation that has an emergency can face sanctions or controls from the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, which are related to the UN and any of its facilities.
The Biden administration reiterated its support to WHO with a letter dated January 26, saying that it also has the backing of 46 other countries, including the U.K., Japan, South Korea, India, South American countries and members of the European Union.
Amendments not made public until much later
The contents of the proposed amendments were not made public until April 12. While the existing WHO regulations provide for an 18-month grace period for nations to withdraw their votes, the current proposed amendments reduced the opportunity to six months. If these amendments are passed, a majority of the nations could change their votes and reverse their approvals in the next months.
A report published by the United Nations in May last year claimed that the pandemic would have been prevented if the WHO had been given more global authority.
“In its current form, the WHO does not possess such powers. To move on with the treaty, WHO therefore needs to be empowered — financially, and politically. The treaty should possess an adaptable incentive regime, [including] sanctions such as public reprimands, economic sanctions, or denial of benefits,” the report stated. (Related: Be warned: The World Health Organization’s “Pandemic Treaty” will destroy all remaining freedoms and unleash a global MEDICAL DICTATORSHIP.)
Liberty Counsel Founder and Chairman Mat Staver said the Biden administration has now set the country up to cede sovereignty concerning the health of Americans to the WHO. The proposed amendments would give the organization global jurisdiction over the United States.
“We have already seen the lawless abuse of power under Joe Biden by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which the courts have fortunately blocked. Americans would have very little recourse against the WHO. America must not give up its sovereignty to the WHO,” he said.
Watch the video below for commentary on how Biden is handing over U.S. sovereignty to the WHO.
This video is from the Secure Life channel on Brighteon.com.
More related stories:
Netflix Adds Graphic Violence Warning Ahead of ‘Stranger Things 4’ Premiere After Texas Shooting
Netflix has added a content warning ahead of the fourth season of Stranger Things following the horrific shooting in Uvalde, Texas, that left 19 children dead along with two teachers.
The disclaimer that will appear during Friday’s premiere will say that the show will contain violent content involving children in the first scene, according to The Hollywood Reporter.
“We filmed this season of Stranger Things a year ago,” the warning reads. “But given the recent tragic shooting at a school in Texas, viewers may find the opening scene of episode 1 distressing. We are deeply saddened by this unspeakable violence, and our hearts go out to every family mourning a loved one.”
Netflix Puts Warning on ‘Stranger Things’ Season 4 After School Shooting https://t.co/xgZkQfvSqL
— The Hollywood Reporter (@THR) May 26, 2022
The description for the premiere episode will also include: “Warning: Contains graphic violence involving children.”
The disclaimer will only be shown in the United States and not globally.
A Netflix spokesperson explained that the opening scene is “very graphic” and warranted the warning.
“We decided to add the card given the proximity of the premiere to this tragedy — and because the opening scene is very graphic,” the spokesperson said.
The move comes after CBS pulled the FBI season finale that featured a student involved in a deadly robbery. Beyond television, other artists have adjusted their schedules in the wake of the shooting. “American Pie” singer Don McLean pulled out of singing at the upcoming NRA convention in Houston.
“In light of the recent events in Texas, I have decided it would be disrespectful and hurtful for me to perform for the NRA at their convention in Houston this week,” McLean said.
“I’m sure all the folks planning to attend this event are shocked and sickened by these events as well. After all, we are all Americans. I share the sorrow for this terrible, cruel loss with the rest of the nation,” he concluded.
Musicians Lee Greenwood and Larry Gatlin are still scheduled to perform at the convention as well as Danielle Peck
FACT CHECK: Jimmy Kimmel Falsely Claims ‘There was an Armed Guard in Uvalde’
CLAIM: During Wednesday’s opening dialogue, Jimmy Kimmel said, “There was an armed guard in Uvalde.”
MOSTLY FALSE: On Wednesday authorities tentatively indicated there was an officer at the school, but on Thursday they said there was not.
Kimmel did not wait for the facts.
Breitbart News noted that the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) reported there was no armed school resource officer at the Uvalde school when a gunman entered.
DPS Regional Director Victor Escalon indicated that at 11:28 a.m., after the gunman crashed a pickup truck near the school and began his attack, the gunman climbed a four-foot-high chain link fence around the school and fired at the school as he approached. He also fired at two eyewitnesses at a funeral home nearby. By 11:40 a.m., he had approached the west side of the school. He “was not confronted by anybody” outside the school, armed or otherwise.
Escalon stressed that was no school resource officer on campus, and that the first report came to police at 11:30 a.m.
During his Wednesday night dialogue, Jimmy Kimmel joined the chorus of gun controllers who rejected the role of a good guy with gun based on the false belief that there had been an armed guard at Uvalde.
Kimmel said, “If your solution to children being massacred is armed guards, you haven’t been paying attention to what’s going on.” He then noted that an armed guard was present in Buffalo and mentioned there was an officer in Parkland, although he did not mention the Parkland school officer did not go into the building to confront the gunman.
Then Kimmel said, “There was an armed guard in Uvalde.”
The Texas DPS tells a different story. There was no armed guard at Uvalde.
Kimmel did not wait for the facts.
AWR Hawkins is an award-winning Second Amendment columnist for Breitbart News and the writer/curator of Down Range with AWR Hawkins, a weekly newsletter focused on all things Second Amendment, also for Breitbart News. He is the political analyst for Armed American Radio and a Turning Point USA Ambassador. Follow him on Instagram: @awr_hawkins. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org. You can sign up to get Down Range at breitbart.com/downrange.
Leftist Journalist Julia Ioffe: ‘What If You Could Perform an Abortion with an AR-15?’
Julia Ioffe, founding partner and Washington correspondent for Puck News, found herself in hot water on Wednesday night when she tweeted that 2nd Amendment advocates would suddenly be for banning AR-15 rifles if they were tools used in abortions.
“What if you could perform an abortion with an AR-15? What if the 19 kids killed [in] Uvalde weren’t children, but fetuses?” Ioffe said in her now-deleted tweet.
Twitter users immediately pounced on Ioffe for not only using the horrible tragedy in Texas as a vehicle to plug abortion but also for suggesting that 19 children would suddenly have no inherent value to her if they were killed in the womb – a mad dash of irony that seemed to escape her.
“You’d defend it?” responded National Journalism Center program director Becket Adams. “What even is the purpose of tweets like hers? What good does it serve? Nothing of value has been done on this website in the past 72 hours, and it’s only getting worse.”
“Don’t kill kids at school and don’t kill kids in the womb — in fact don’t kill them anywhere — is my baseline. Is it yours?” tweeted Washington Examiner reporter Jerry Dunleavy.
“Where have I seen this before? Oh, right, on a pro-life t-shirt,” tweeted National Review Washington correspondent John McCormack.
Though Ioffe deleted the tweet, she issued no apology. As noted by Fox News, her statement echoes her flub from 2021 in which she made an inadvertent pro-life argument while attacking the Texas Heartbeat Act.
“If you are anti-choice and you want to make sure women carry every pregnancy to term, why not make the person who created the pregnancy contribute? Why not have men pay child support to the women they impregnate? Surely, it is not the woman’s responsibility alone?” she tweeted.
Indeed, hardcore leftists and opposers of gun rights have (quite oddly) been citing abortion as some trump card against pro-lifers in the wake of the Texas massacre.
“YOU CAN KILL CHILDREN IN SCHOOL IN TEXAS BUT CAN’T GET AN ABORTION,” tweeted Rob Reiner’s daughter, Romy Reiner, which the director himself retweeted.
YOU CAN KILL CHILDREN IN SCHOOL IN TEXAS BUT CAN’T GET AN ABORTION.
— romy (@romyreiner) May 24, 2022
Uvalde Mom ‘Destroyed’ By Loss of Only Daughter, Calls Texas Gov. Abbott ‘Embarrassment’
Farewell Andy Fletcher: A Toast to Depeche Mode’s Quiet One
‘Top Gun: Maverick’ Finally Hits Theaters — Here’s When You’ll Be Able to Watch It Online
Proposed law in Maryland would allow mothers to kill their babies up to 28 days after birth
California introduces new bill that would allow mothers to kill their babies up to 7 days after birth
100+ nations have global agreement now being deployed called ‘Project Sandman’ to drop and end dominance of U.S. dollar and petrodollar
Politics19 hours ago
Trump CONFIRMS he will attend the NRA convention in Houston on Friday but attendees WON’T be able to bring in their guns
Politics19 hours ago
‘Go f**k yourselves’, Zelensky office tells Western officials
Sports17 hours ago
2022 Dolphins could be the year’s most interesting, least predictable team
Politics22 hours ago
HERO: Injured Off-Duty Border Patrol Agent Shot and Killed Mass Murderer Salvador Ramos (VIDEO)
Empty Talk15 hours ago
[WATCH] DreamDoll Brings French Montana Along for Sizzling “Ice Cream Dream” Video
Sports17 hours ago
Circus act fifth inning dooms Phillies in second straight loss to Braves
Politics22 hours ago
Cruz: Dems Blocked My Legislation to Harden Schools, Keep Guns Away from Criminals from Getting 60 Votes
Sports22 hours ago
Trey Lance reveals which 49ers player is the biggest trash talker