Connect with us

News

GIRL SCOUTS OF TROPICAL FLORIDA LAUNCHES 2022 COOKIE SEASON

Published

on

girl-scouts-of-tropical-florida-launches-2022-cookie-season

Girl Scouts of Tropical Florida is excited to kick off the 2022 Girl Scout Cookie season with a new addition to the long list of time honored favorites, and introducing AdventurefulsTM. AdventurefulsTM  are an indulgent brownie-inspired cookie with caramel-flavored crème and a hint of sea salt, and an incredible taste of adventure in every bite.

Girl Scouts in Miami-Dade and Monroe will again embrace their skills in what is the world’s largest girl-led entrepreneurial business. Here is how cookies will be sold:

  • Cookies are available through online platforms and innovative “virtual cookie booths” with the Digital Cookie online platform and social media (with parental supervision) to promote their virtual cookie business to friends and family.
  • Through the Digital Cookie online platform, girls will be able to offer customers contactless delivery/drop-off, the ability to ship cookies directly to customers, and the option to donate cookies to our local Hometown Heroes.
  • Girl Scouts are holding cookie booths for in-person purchases of Thin Mints®, Samoas®, Adventurefuls™ ,Lemon-Ups, and other Girl Scout Cookie favorites now through February 21, 2022. Cookie purchases are an investment in girl leadership in your local community. With every sale, the Girl Scout Cookie Program teaches girls how to think like entrepreneurs as they run their own small businesses and learn skills like goal setting, money management, business ethics, people skills, and decision making—which are imperative for any leadership role. And girls decide how to use their portion of the proceeds for unforgettable leadership experiences and community projects, while GSTF depends on the funds to deliver life-changing Girl Scout programming to nearly 3,000 girls in every zip code across Miami-Dade and Monroe.

“The cookie program is what fuels girls’ goals, and is proven to build girls’ leadership skills and help them become successful in life. We’re proud of the ways Girl Scouts are running their cookie businesses safely all while learning skills such as money management, goal setting, and customer service. We look forward to a robust season,” said Chelsea Wilkerson, CEO of GSTF.

For more information about cookies and to find cookies near you, please visit: Please visit our Cookie Finder to find cookies near you: https://www.girlscoutsfl.org/cookies.

About Girl Scouts of Tropical Florida:

Girl Scouts is the preeminent leadership development organization for girls. We believe in the power of every girl to change the world, and our programs offer each one a chance to practice a lifetime of leadership, adventure, and success. Girl Scouts of Tropical Florida was founded in 1923 and currently serves nearly 3,000 girls in grades K-12 from every zip code across Miami-Dade and Monroe counties. To volunteer, reconnect, donate, or join, visit www.girlscoutsfl.org.


Connect To Your Customers & Grow Your Business

Click Here


Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

News

Appeals Court Says Florida Tech Law Violates First Amendment

Published

on

appeals-court-says-florida-tech-law-violates-first-amendment

TALLAHASSEE (CBSMiami/NSF) – Dealing a major setback to Gov. Ron DeSantis, a three-judge appellate panel on Monday ruled that a 2021 Florida law targeting social-media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter unconstitutionally restricts the companies’ First Amendment rights.

Monday’s decision by the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld most of a preliminary injunction imposed in June by U.S. District Judge Robert Hinkle.

READ MORE: Site Of Surfside Condo Collapse To Be Sold To Dubai Developer

“Put simply, with minor exceptions, the government can’t tell a private person or entity what to say or how to say it,” appellate Judge Kevin Newsom wrote in a 67-page unanimous opinion joined by Judges Gerald Tjoflat and Ed Carnes.

DeSantis made the tech-targeting measure one of his top 2021 legislative priorities, accusing tech companies of having a liberal bias and censoring speech by Republicans.

The law, in part, sought to prevent large social-media platforms from banning political candidates from their sites and to require companies to publish — and apply consistently — standards about issues such as banning users or blocking content.

NetChoice and the Computer & Communications Industry Association, groups that represent tech titans such as Twitter, Facebook and Google, filed the lawsuit.

The industry groups argued the measure violated the First Amendment rights of companies and would harm their ability to moderate content on the platforms.

Lawyers for the state maintained that the social-media companies are quashing users’ speech rights.

But in Monday’s decision, Newsom repeatedly swatted down the state’s arguments.

“Not in their wildest dreams could anyone in the Founding generation have imagined Facebook, Twitter, YouTube or TikTok. But ‘whatever the challenges of applying the Constitution to ever-advancing technology, the basic principles of freedom of speech and the press, like the First Amendment’s command, do not vary when a new and different medium for communication appears,’” Newsom, who was appointed to the Atlanta-based appeals court by former President Donald Trump, wrote. “One of those ‘basic principles’ — indeed, the most basic of the basic — is that ‘(t)he Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment constrains governmental actors and protects private actors.’”

Even the largest social-media companies “are ‘private actors’ whose rights the First Amendment protects,” the judge added.

The panel found that “it is substantially likely” that social-media companies’ content-moderation decisions “constitute protected exercises of editorial judgment, and that the provisions of the new Florida law that restrict large platforms’ ability to engage in content moderation unconstitutionally burden that prerogative.”

The appeals-court decision left intact much of Hinkle’s preliminary injunction blocking the law. But it vacated the injunction on provisions requiring social-media platforms to publish their standards for determining how they censor, deplatform and “shadow ban” users. The panel also lifted the injunction on a provision prohibiting companies from changing their standards more than once every 30 days.

Also, the ruling removed a block on parts of the law requiring companies to allow users who have been deplatformed to access and retrieve all of their content for at least 60 days after they are stripped from a platform.

Plaintiffs in the lawsuit hailed Monday’s ruling.

“The 11th Circuit makes clear that regardless of size, online companies are private actors whose rights the First Amendment protects, putting to bed the red herring assertions of common carrier or dominance,” Carl Szabo, vice president and general counsel of NetChoice, said in a prepared statement. “The First Amendment protects platforms and their right to moderate content as they see fit — and the government can’t force them to host content they don’t want.”

READ MORE: Report: Three Americans Died Of Carbon Monoxide Poisoning At Bahamas Resort

DeSantis’ office didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment, but Attorney General Ashley Moody focused on the parts of the law that the appeals court backed.

“We are pleased the court recognized the state’s authority to rein in social media companies and upheld major portions of Florida’s law leading the way in doing so. We will continue to vigorously defend Florida’s authority to demand accountability from Big Tech,” Moody said in a Twitter post.

But Matt Schruers, president of the Computer & Communications Industry Association, disagreed.

“The opinion speaks for itself,” Schruers said. “It’s a 60-plus-page dress-down.”

During arguments in the state’s appeal last month, Brian Barnes, a private attorney who represents the DeSantis administration, told the panel that social-media platforms such as Twitter — which has roughly 300 million monthly users — should be regulated in the same way as “common carriers.” Common carriers can include such service providers as transportation and telecommunications businesses.

But the panel found that common-carrier limitations don’t apply to social-media companies, which “moderate and curate the content” disseminated on their platforms.

“Neither law nor logic recognizes government authority to strip an entity of its First Amendment rights merely by labeling it a common carrier,” Newsom wrote. “The problem, as we’ve explained, is that social-media platforms don’t serve the public indiscriminately but, rather, exercise editorial judgment to curate the content that they display and disseminate.”

DeSantis pushed the social-media crackdown (SB 7072) after Twitter and Facebook blocked Trump from their platforms after his supporters rampaged at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

“Day in and day out, our freedom of speech as conservatives is under attack by the ‘big tech’ oligarchs in Silicon Valley,” the governor said at a bill-signing ceremony in May 2021.

But Monday’s ruling said social-media platforms “exercise editorial judgment that is inherently expressive” and thus are protected by the Constitution.

“When platforms choose to remove users or posts, deprioritize content in viewers’ feeds or search results, or sanction breaches of their community standards, they engage in First-Amendment-protected activity,” Newsom wrote. “We conclude that social-media platforms’ content-moderation activities — permitting, removing, prioritizing, and deprioritizing users and posts — constitute ‘speech’ within the meaning of the First Amendment.”

The law’s restrictions on companies’ ability to moderate content “do not further any substantial governmental interest — much less a compelling one,” the panel found.

“Indeed, the State’s briefing doesn’t even argue that these provisions can survive heightened scrutiny. (The State seems to have wagered pretty much everything on the argument that S.B. 7072’s provisions don’t trigger First Amendment scrutiny at all.) Nor can we discern any substantial or compelling interest that would justify the act’s significant restrictions on platforms’ editorial judgment,” Newsom wrote. “Put simply, there’s no legitimate — let alone substantial — governmental interest in leveling the expressive playing field.”

Monday’s ruling is contrary to a recent decision by a panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a case about a similar Texas law.

A U.S. district judge issued a preliminary injunction last year against the Texas law. But a divided panel of the 5th Circuit this month issued a stay of that preliminary injunction — effectively allowing the Texas law to take effect while the overall case continues to play out.

MORE NEWS: Coral Gables resident says city’s automatic license plate recognition cameras are a constitutional violation

(©2022 CBS Local Media. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The News Service of Florida’s Dara Kam contributed to this report.)

Continue Reading

News

Site Of Surfside Condo Collapse To Be Sold To Dubai Developer

Published

on

site-of-surfside-condo-collapse-to-be-sold-to-dubai-developer

MIAMI (CBSMiami) – The land where the Champlain Towers South condo once stood in Surfside before its tragic collapse will be sold.

On Tuesday, there will be a hearing on the matter. There will be no auction since the only bid came from Dubai developer DAMAC Properties for $120 million.

READ MORE: Appeals Court Says Florida Tech Law Violates First Amendment

The land on Collins Avenue will not be turned into a memorial for those who died, instead, it will be used for another ultra-luxury high rise condo.

READ MORE: Report: Three Americans Died Of Carbon Monoxide Poisoning At Bahamas Resort

The Champlain Towers South fell on June 24, 2021, killing 98 people.

MORE NEWS: Coral Gables resident says city’s automatic license plate recognition cameras are a constitutional violation

Earlier this month, a settlement of nearly a billion dollars was reached. The money will be divided among the victims’ families and survivors.

CBSMiami.com Team

Continue Reading

News

Report: Three Americans Died Of Carbon Monoxide Poisoning At Bahamas Resort

Published

on

report:-three-americans-died-of-carbon-monoxide-poisoning-at-bahamas-resort

MIAMI (CBSMiami) – Three Americans who died at a resort in the Bahamas earlier this month were killed by carbon monoxide poisoning, according to Bahamian news reports.

Michael and Robbie Phillips from Tennessee and Vincent Chiarella from Florida were found dead inside their villas at the Sandals Emerald Bay Resort in Exuma Island on May 6th.

READ MORE: Appeals Court Says Florida Tech Law Violates First Amendment

Chiarella’s wife, Donna, survived. She was flown to Kendall Regional Hospital for treatment.

The autopsy and toxicology reports are expected to be released soon, according to the newspapers.

READ MORE: Site Of Surfside Condo Collapse To Be Sold To Dubai Developer

The night before their deaths, the Phillips complained they were feeling ill and were treated at a local medical facility.

The next morning, police say Michael Phillips was found slumped against a wall in his villa. Robbie Phillips was on their bed. Both showed signs of convulsion.

Minutes earlier, police had found Vincent Chiarella dead on the floor of his villa. Donna Chiarella was experiencing severe swelling and paralysis.

MORE NEWS: Coral Gables resident says city’s automatic license plate recognition cameras are a constitutional violation

Samples taken from the couples’ rooms were analyzed to determine what may have led to their deaths. A lab in Philadelphia assisted with toxicological examinations in conjunction with Bahamian pathologists.

CBSMiami.com Team

Continue Reading

Trending

  • Sign up to be notified of our latest news!