(Natural News) For the past couple of years since the installation of Joe Biden as president, his supporters have pushed back on any claims by Republicans or Democrats that the 2020 election was stolen from President Donald Trump.
Their biggest excuse has always been: ‘There is no proof the election was rigged and thus stolen.’
And while some bits and pieces of evidence have emerged since, there has not been a smoking gun.
Until now.
A new documentary film by Dinesh D’Souza featuring highly experienced election analysts who use both data and video proves beyond any reasonable doubt that Democrats conspired to pull off the greatest election theft in the history of our country. And worse, unless Republican legislatures in key battleground states do more to secure elections moving forward, this will happen again and again until our elections become completely meaningless.
“Just saw #2000Mules. Why is it devastating? Because #TrueTheVote’s Catherine Engelbrecht teamed up w/a guy who’s run election data for 40 years. What did they do? They bought publicly available cell phone data & asked some very simple questions. What were they?” the thread begins.
The ‘election data guy’ is Gregg Philips, by the way.
“Basically: What are the odds? ‘What are the odds of WHAT, Annie?’ Well, they started with, let’s say a green dot. This green dot was one cell phone. This cell phone visited a ballot drop-off box. ‘Well, what’s so strange about THAT, Annie?’ I’ll tell you what,” the thread continues.
“That one green dot visited that box more than once on more than one day. ‘Well, come on! Maybe he has elderly parents or something. He’s a helper!’ Ok, but what if I told you he visited MORE than one box on MORE than one day? ‘Now, Annie. You’re just being cynical!’ Am I? Ok,” the user noted further.
“What if I told you this green dot visited a non-profit before he went to those boxes? Have I got your attention now? Good. This green dot was tracked going to multiple non-profits then going to multiple drop-boxes on multiple days,” the user added.
In an interview with Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk ahead of the film’s release — Kirk is in the film too, by the way — Engelbrecht and Philips described what they found when they obtained several terabytes worth of video and cellphone tracking data.
Philips noted that the acts of stuffing ballot boxes in various parts of the country — mostly swing states — followed a consistent pattern, with every operation featuring “a set of collectors, a collection point or stash house for all the ballots, the bundling of those ballots, and then the casting of those ballots [in the drop boxes] by, what we were calling, ‘mules.’”
“And as we began putting the pieces and parts together, it really did dawn on us: ‘Well, this sounds like what’s happening in Atlanta or in San Luis, Arizona’… This was a conspiracy, this was organized crime,” he explained.
A press release noted:
True the Vote spent $2 million to buy publicly available cell phone data that can pinpoint an individual’s location to within a few inches. They then narrowed their search to targets that began visiting drop boxes and NGO offices during the early voting weeks leading up to November 3rd, activity that was contrary to their prior “pattern of life.” In Georgia, the threshold was at least two dozen trips to drop boxes and five visits to a non-profit.
Through open records requests, True the Vote acquired dropbox surveillance video where they could find it, which then assisted in confirming that trafficking had occurred.
“This is how money laundering works,” Philips said, noting that the pair saw the worst ballot-stuffing in the swing state of Pennsylvania (concentrated mostly in deep blue Philadelphia, of course). “This is not just a one-off thing, this is not some Democrat activist that really wanted Trump gone and might have had a couple friends do this. This was a machine.”
“We need to have hearings. And that’s what I’m looking forward to in a Republican majority in the House of Representatives,” she said.
“If we can have geo-tracking when it comes to January 6th, and come to peoples’ homes who were holding a sign outside of the Capitol and interview them–have the FBI interview them … then I certainly think we can use that same technology to look at people who may have been harvesting ballots illegally and possibly, potentially even paid to do so by non-profit organizations,” she added.
SparkToro, a software company that roots out fake “bot” accounts known as “spambots” from social media companies found that nearly half of Joe Biden’s 22.2 million Twitter followers are not real humans, Newsweek reported this week.
The audit conducted by SparkToro’s tool found that Biden, who reportedly received 81 million votes during the 2020 presidential election, has more fake followers than most accounts on Twitter — accounting for more than 49% of those following the official @POTUS account on the site.
The software company based their audit findings on an analysis of “location issues, default profile images, date of creation, and more,” reports state. If true, it would mean that Biden’s support on the big tech platform is artificially inflated. It may also mean more bumps in the road for Twitter, as billionaire Elon Musk continues to criticize the company for the presence of fake spambot accounts on the platform.
‘FAKE NEWS!’ A tool created by the software company SparkToro found that almost half of President Joe Biden’s 22.2 million Twitter followers were “spam bots.” https://t.co/APE7ttIyWjpic.twitter.com/GTn4mpnpwg
Tesla and Space X CEO Elon Musk was unimpressed with Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal’s lengthy explanation for how the big tech platform fights spam, with the South African billionaire responding with an unflattering emoji and a probing question about Twitter’s advertising practices.
Musk had previously expressed doubt in the company’s claim that only 5% of its users are bots and put his acquisition of the company on hold.
After Agrawal issued a 13-tweet thread about how his platform fights spam, Musk responded with a poop emoji, and would later comment “interesting” under a Twitter poll showing a majority of users believe Agrawal’s tweets about spam bots to be untruthful.
“We suspend over half a million spam accounts every day, usually before any of you even see them on Twitter. We also lock millions of accounts each week that we suspect may be spam, if they can’t pass human verification challenges (captchas, phone verification, etc),” Agrawal wrote.
“Unfortunately, we don’t believe that this specific estimation can be performed externally,” wrote Agrawal. “Externally, it’s not even possible to know which accounts are counted as” real users “on any given day.”
“So how do advertisers know what they’re getting for their money?” Musk tweeted, “This is fundamental to the financial health of Twitter.”
“20% fake/spam accounts, while 4 times what Twitter claims, could be *much* higher,” Musk said.
“My offer was based on Twitter’s SEC filings being accurate,” he continued. “Yesterday, Twitter’s CEO publicly refused to show proof of <5% (spam accounts). This deal cannot move forward until he does.”
The Department of Homeland Security is reportedly pausing the Disinformation Governance Board three weeks after its creation was challenged by Republicans.
The Washington Post’s Taylor Lorenz reports that the DHS decided to shut down the board on Monday and that its leader Nina Jankowicz had drafted a resignation letter in response to their decision.
The DHS has offered Jankowicz the chance to stay in the department, defending her in a statement to the Washington Post.
The Biden Administration is now trying to paint Jankowicz as a victim after journalists questioned her role citing a host of questionable positions on freedom of speech and government censorship as well as cringeworthy Tik-Tok videos.
“Nina Jankowicz has been subjected to unjustified and vile personal attacks and physical threats,” a DHS spokesperson said in a statement.
“These smears leveled by bad-faith, right-wing actors against a deeply qualified expert and against efforts to better combat human smuggling and domestic terrorism are disgusting,” deputy White House press secretary Andrew Bates said in a statement.
Jankowicz was told by DHS officials to stay silent about her role in the department after she tried to defend a statement she made on Twitter about Hunter Biden.
For those who believe this tweet is a key to all my views, it is simply a direct quote from both candidates during the final presidential debate. If you look at my timeline, you will see I was livetweeting that evening. https://t.co/nI7ZgBtTLChttps://t.co/4DjBl9bzt0
With Republicans likely to win the majority in one or both houses of Congress next term, Jankowicz would likely be subject to more questions and congressional testimony about her role on the disinformation board.
Behind the scenes, the DHS appeared to concede the fight to save Jankowicz was over but indicated they would look for other ways to combat misinformation.
“We’re going to need another Nina down the road,” a DHS staffer said anonymously to The Washington Post. “And anyone who takes that position is going to be vulnerable to a disinformation campaign or attack.”
The U.S. Soccer Federation announced Wednesday that it has agreed to a deal to pay the players on the U.S. Women’s National Team the same as it pays players on the U.S. Men’s National Team.
The collective bargaining contract will run through 2028 and includes “equalization” of World Cup prize money, according to NPR.
In a historic accomplishment, U.S. Soccer, @USMNT and @USWNT have come together to agree to new collective bargaining agreements that will run through 2028 and achieve true equal pay – including equalization of World Cup prize money.
The contract comes after several years of efforts by the USWNT to force the federation to deliver equal pay between the two teams. The agreement will also afford women players $22 million in back pay.
“We hope that this Agreement and its historic achievements in not only providing for equal pay but also in improving the training and playing environment for national team players will similarly serve as the foundation for continued growth of women’s soccer both in the United States and abroad,” said USWNT player Becky Sauerbrunn.
The pay scales between the two teams have “identical economic terms,” the federation reports, which includes equal pay for annual salaries and incentives and tournament play, including the two World Cups.
The agreements, which run through 2028, contain:
➖ Equalization of FIFA World Cup prize money ➖ Identical appearance fees and game bonuses ➖ Commercial revenue sharing for the first time ever
The teams will also have the same deals in revenue sharing on ticket sales.
“This is a truly historic moment,” U.S. Soccer President Cindy Parlow Cone said after the announcement. “These agreements have changed the game forever here in the United States and have the potential to change the game around the world.”
While the agreement is being called “equal pay,” the deal actually heavily favors the women. Women’s soccer has far fewer fans, both watching on TV and going to stadiums.
The 2019 Women’s World Cup, for instance, reached a record high of 1.12 billion viewers across the world. That may sound like a lot until you realize that the year before, the Men’s World Cup earned 3.572 billion viewers worldwide and earned $6 billion in profits.
The earning disparity is nothing new, either. For example, the 2010 Men’s World Cup earned $4 billion in revenue. But the Women’s World Cup that year earned only $73 million.
Men’s soccer reaches far more fans and earns far more money from ticket sales and sponsorship. But if women are now being paid the same as the male players, that means the women players reap greater rewards for bringing far less income into the league than their male counterparts.