Connect with us

Politics

Now Utah is discriminating against White people, denying them monoclonal antibodies as covid treatment

Published

on

now-utah-is-discriminating-against-white-people,-denying-them-monoclonal-antibodies-as-covid-treatment
Image: Now Utah is discriminating against White people, denying them monoclonal antibodies as covid treatment

(Natural News)
A new policy in the “red” state of Utah prioritizes “people of color” above whites when it comes to accessing treatment for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19).

A 25-year-old whose parents were born in Cuba, for example, can now be offered monoclonal antibodies instead of a 62-year-old “white race” American simply due to skin color.

This “progressive” guideline can be found on Page 6 of Utah’s Monoclonal Antibody Allocation Guidelines document.

Some health systems in Texas are doing the same thing by sending non-whites to the front of the line, while whites are told to get to the back of the bus.

Certain other factors are also being considered in the prioritization list such as obesity and other preexisting health conditions. Still, a young, healthy non-white person now has priority access over an elderly white person, generally speaking.

Monoclonal antibodies are still a “passive vaccine”

Tucker Carlson covered the issue as well (watch below). He calls this “collective punishment” against white people for the perceived injustices they supposedly inflicted on non-white people.

Since Carlson still has a show on Fox News, the segment is extremely sanitized. Carlson contends that there was “no treatment” available for the Fauci Flu until Donald “father of the vaccine” Trump’s Operation Warp Speed “vaccines” came along.

Carlson seems to support said vaccines, which right off the bat calls into question his perspective on the matter. Even so, he remains one of the prominent voices that many conservatives listen to, and he did address this race-based medicine issue.

Brighteon.TV

Carlson first brought up the fact that Joe Biden’s regime plotted out a race-based medicine protocol before Hunter’s dad was even installed into the White House. They then started trying to ration out the injections to non-whites as a first priority, and are now apparently doing the same with monoclonal antibodies.

“Never in American history, modern history in any case, has the federal government made it official policy to withhold lifesaving medical treatment from Americans on the basis of their skin color,” Carlson said. “But that’s exactly what the CDC did.”

While it would seem as though the intent of all this is to rile up whites and make them feel as though they are missing out and being discriminated against, it is important to recognize the reverse psychology at play here.

Firstly, the so-called “vaccines” are not something that white people, or any other people for that matter, want injected into them due to the dangers involved. Just because there is race-based discrimination supposedly going on with how they are being administered does not necessarily mean that they are desirable to get.

The same goes for monoclonal antibodies, which are called a “passive vaccine” because of how they work.

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. calls its REGEN-COV formula a passive vaccine right on its website. What do we really know about this “alternative” to the primary vaccines that leads us to believe it is any safer or more effective?

“This would matter if healthcare mattered,” is how one commenter put it.

“Since it has become mandatory that you agree that if I, with XX chromosomes, claim to be a woman that I am a woman, why can’t I magically become a ‘woman of color?’” joked another.

“Everything in that list is ‘fluid,’” suggested another, echoing that same point. “Just tell them what you are until the proper number appears.”

“In medicine you are supposed to triage medical care based on individual medical need, not based on group identity,” wrote yet another about how real medicine works.

The latest news about how the Fauci Flu is destroying society can be found at Collapse.news.

Sources for this article include:

Twitter.com

Utah.gov

NaturalNews.com

Regeneron.com

CitizenFreePress.com

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Politics

Michigan Democrats Face Backlash After Telling Parents They Should Not Be Involved in What Public Schools Teach Their Children

Published

on

michigan-democrats-face-backlash-after-telling-parents-they-should-not-be-involved-in-what-public-schools-teach-their-children

Michigan Democrats lectured parents on Facebook this past weekend. The Democrat Party told parents they are not ‘clients’ of public schools and that public education teaches kids what society ‘needs them to know.’

A Facebook post on Saturday shared by the state’s Democrats on their official page attacked the idea that parents should be involved in what public school teaches their children.

The Democrats took the post down on Monday — not because they don’t believe the post but because it gives away their true agenda.

TRENDING: WATCH: Boston Cops Threaten, Harrass THE WRONG WOMAN Over Vax Card: ‘We Don’t Enforce Mandates, We Protect Rights’

FOX News reported:

A Saturday post made by the Michigan Democrats on their official Facebook page criticized the parents who want to play a role in what public education teaches their children. The post was deleted Monday morning after intense criticism.

“Not sure where this ‘parents-should-control-what-is-taught-in-schools-because-they-are-our-kids’ is originating, but parents do have the option to send their kids to a hand-selected private school at their own expense if this is what they desire,” the post read.

“The purpose of public education in public schools is not to teach kids only what parents want them to be taught,” the Michigan Democratic Party’s post continued. “It is to teach them what society needs them to know. The client of the public school is not the parent, but the entire community, the public.”

The Michigan Democratic Party later deleted that post and issued a quasi-apology.

“We have deleted a post that ignored the important role parents play—and should play—in Michigan public schools. Parents need to have a say in their children’s education, end of story,” a subsequent post on Monday stated. “The post does not reflect the views of Michigan Democrats and should not be misinterpreted as a statement of support from our elected officials or candidates.”

The state’s Republicans were sharply critical of the Democrats’ original post.

Continue Reading

Politics

US Army Guerrilla Warfare Exercise to Target “Freedom Fighters”

Published

on

us-army-guerrilla-warfare-exercise-to-target-“freedom-fighters”

The US Army is set to conduct a “guerrilla warfare exercise” later this month in North Carolina where troops will battle against “freedom fighters.”

Yes, really.

The two week “unconventional warfare exercise” will take from from Jan. 22-Feb. 4 on privately owned land in a remote location which remains unknown.

“Called Robin Sage, the exercise serves as a final test for Special Forces Qualification Course training and it places candidates in a politically unstable country known as Pineland,” reports the Charlotte Observer.

“These military members act as realistic opposing forces and guerrilla freedom fighters, also known as Pineland resistance movement,” said the the U.S. Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center.

Information about the exercise was provided to the media in a bid to avoid civilians confusing the drills with actual terrorist attacks or warfare, which has happened before.

“It will be realistic enough to include the sounds of gunfire (blanks) and flares,” said the center.

As Chris Menahan notes, a similar Robin Sage exercise in 2019 showed resistance fighters displaying a flag that says “liberty.”

“They could tell these soldiers they’re battling the Chinese, Russians, Iranians, North Koreans or other foreign enemies but instead they have them training to kill “freedom fighters” with “Liberty” flags,” writes Menahan.

The exercise will do little to dampen concerns that the Biden administration is launching a de facto ‘domestic war on terror’ targeting patriots and Trump supporters.

Following the January 6 Capitol riot, Democrats ludicrously compared the events to September 11 in an attempt to justify using federal resources that would normally be focused on actual terrorists against American conservatives.

Earlier this month, the Justice Department created a new “specialized unit focused on domestic terrorism” in response to an “elevated” threat from violent extremists in the United States.

NEW: Citing “elevated threat from domestic violent extremists,” DOJ official announces creation of new domestic terrorism unit “to augment our existing approach.” https://t.co/v1W3qyU6rl pic.twitter.com/HfnIM3X4Xr

— ABC News (@ABC) January 11, 2022

However, polls show that Americans are split on who represents the biggest threat, particularly after the Waukesha attack, its subsequent cover up, in addition to the fact that left-wing extremists spent much of 2020 rioting and burning down American cities.

A recent Schoen Cooperman Research survey found that voters are split on domestic extremism, with 23 per cent naming left-wing extremism and 21 per cent naming right-wing extremism as the greater concern.

Following the January 6 incident, Army General Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said he wanted to understand “white rage,” although an interest in understanding “black rage” after a sustained period of violent mayhem caused by Black Lives Matter protesters wasn’t seemingly of any importance.

“I want to understand white rage, and I’m white,” Gen. Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said while testifying before Congress, pushing back on accusations from a Republican congressman that the military was becoming too “woke.” https://t.co/ix4dKxrC2d pic.twitter.com/HkFVB7d6Ur

— The New York Times (@nytimes) June 24, 2021

———————————————————————————————————————

ALERT!

In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.

I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.

Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

Get early access, exclusive content and behinds the scenes stuff by following me on Locals.

———————————————————————————————————————

Be sure to join Alex Jones and Infowars on GETTR! Save the future and join the next Renaissance by following these NEW accounts for breaking news and exclusive information today!

Continue Reading

Politics

MIT-Educated Doctor Ordered to Undergo Psych Evaluation After Prescribing Ivermectin

Published

on

mit-educated-doctor-ordered-to-undergo-psych-evaluation-after-prescribing-ivermectin

An MIT-educated doctor who prescribed COVID patients Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine had her medical license suspended and was ordered to undergo a psychiatric evaluation.

Maine’s Board of Licensure in Medicine voted to pull Dr Meryl Nass’ medical license for 30 days after accusing her of circulating “misinformation” about COVID-19.

Health officials asserted that Nass “constitutes an immediate jeopardy to the health and physical safety of the public who might receive her medical services” as a result of her procuring anti-viral drugs to treat COVID.

The medical board voted to suspend Nass after receiving just two complaints that she was posting false information on her blog and on Twitter.

A doctor informed the Maine board of how he was contacted by the son of a patient who claimed his father was “borderline delirious” and “not doing well” after being prescribed Ivermectin by Nass.

Nass also self-reported to the medical board when she admitted obtaining Hydroxychloroquine by falsely claiming her COVID patient was suffering from Lyme disease.

“This was the only way to get a potentially life-saving drug for my patient,” said Ness.

This is why so few doctors are willing to speak up. In this crazy world, they are risking everything for not toeing the line. This is someone who showed actual courage. https://t.co/YaX5zHgUGL

— DMChowdhs (@DChowdhs) January 18, 2022

In her blog posts, Ness has questioned the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines, asserting that they are associated with reproductive harm.

Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine have proven controversial because they are not officially authorized by the FDA to treat COVID, but some doctors and prominent public figures have asserted that they work well against the virus.

The media has also engaged in misinformation surrounding Ivermectin, with the Associated Press having to apologize for falsely claiming that 70 per cent of calls to the Mississippi Poison Control Center were about people ingesting ivermectin to treat COVID-19.

CNN refused to apologize to Joe Rogan after falsely claiming the podcast host took “horse dewormer,” despite Rogan having been given Ivermectin, a drug routinely used to treat humans, by a licensed doctor.

“They shouldn’t have said it was horse dewormer,” acknowledged CNN’s Dr. Sanjay Gupta during an appearance on Rogan’s show.

Last week, Rogan accused CNN of doctoring a video of himself from last year in which the host announced that he had COVID.

Joe Rogan asks Sanjay Gupta if it bothers him that CNN outright lied about Rogan taking horse dewormer to recover from covid. This is fantastic: pic.twitter.com/PEgJqIXhSD

— Clay Travis (@ClayTravis) October 14, 2021

———————————————————————————————————————

ALERT!

In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch.

I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here.

Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown.

Get early access, exclusive content and behinds the scenes stuff by following me on Locals.

———————————————————————————————————————

Be sure to join Alex Jones and Infowars on GETTR! Save the future and join the next Renaissance by following these NEW accounts for breaking news and exclusive information today!

Continue Reading

Trending